10 June 2026
The English High Court has issued a worldwide freezing injunction over cryptocurrency held in offshore wallets, marking a significant development in the legal recovery of digital assets. The ruling confirms that Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies constitute property under English law, opening the door to civil enforcement action for fraud victims.
20 May 2026
English law provides powerful tools for victims of cryptocurrency theft, including proprietary injunctions, Norwich Pharmacal orders and Bankers Trust orders. These mechanisms allow solicitors to compel exchanges and custodians to disclose transaction records, enabling effective tracing and recovery of stolen digital assets.
8 April 2026
The Financial Conduct Authority has issued an updated alert as reports of cryptocurrency investment scams rise sharply across the UK. Victims are increasingly being targeted through social media platforms and encrypted messaging apps. Legal action remains available even where funds have been moved offshore.
15 March 2026
Victims of cryptocurrency fraud in the UK face a choice between pursuing civil proceedings for asset recovery or relying on criminal confiscation orders. Each route carries distinct advantages depending on the scale of loss, the traceability of funds, and whether identified perpetrators are within the jurisdiction.
10 February 2026
A proprietary injunction is one of the most effective remedies available to crypto fraud victims under English law. It prevents a defendant from dealing with or dissipating assets, preserving them pending trial. Speed is critical — legal advice should be sought immediately upon discovering a loss.
18 January 2026
Blockchain analytics firms are now a standard part of the crypto recovery process, working alongside legal teams to trace the movement of stolen funds across wallets and exchanges. Courts have accepted blockchain evidence in support of freezing injunctions and disclosure orders in several recent UK decisions.
14 October 2025
A growing area of litigation involves claims against cryptocurrency exchanges that facilitated the onward movement of stolen assets. Where an exchange failed to conduct adequate KYC or AML checks, it may face claims in knowing receipt or dishonest assistance under English law.